Guy How To Masterbate Vids

BERLIN WALL: THE FRAUD OF WEST BERLIN

But where he spent the "Berlin Wall"?

Speaking of the "Berlin Wall" are often heard making statements like: "The wall divided Berlin and Germany into two: one part was East Berlin with East Germany and West Berlin with the other West Germany. " Or: "The wall holding prisoners citizens of East Berlin (sic)."

This "common place" over the years has been fueled by obsessive litany of anti-Western media. Here's how to read, for example, a service of vintage Rai: "It 's just past midnight on August 13, 1961. The Army and the People's Militia, the Vopos, Islander East Berlin (sic), capital of the GDR, the western world, laying a barrier of barbed wire "

The Berlin Wall ... West
"Repeat a lie a hundred, a thousand, a million times and become a truth," Goebbels said that surely he meant. But in this case could simply open an old atlas to see what Berlin actually looked like a small circle divided into two in the middle of East Germany (GDR)! West Berlin was not at all part of West Germany (FRG), was near the border of which more than 100 km, but it was right in the territory of the GDR! And the wall to be built in 1961, not "held prisoner" citizens of East Berlin who could move freely throughout the territory of the GDR, but surrounded exclusively West Berlin (white semi-circle in the map)!

error
Stalin at the conferences of Yalta and Potsdam it was decided to split Germany into four administrative zones: Soviet, British, French and American. Despite the intransigence of the myth of Stalin's USSR, the Soviets did an incredible concession, agreed in Berlin, in the middle of their zone of control (later GDR), there were three armies of occupation of capitalist powers: the French, American and English!

To understand the enormity of the issue enough to imagine the same thing in reverse. It would have been possible, in the middle of the American occupation zone, not far from Austria and Italy, a Monaco divided into two parts, one of which is under the military control of the USSR, forever? Unthinkable!

It was a great ingenuity and a serious error, which undermined the foundations of the future state of the GDR, since the Western powers could proceed almost undisturbed by propaganda, espionage, sabotage and counter-actions, in the capital the largest socialist country in Europe.

Soviet weaknesses and the theft of the American West Berlin
The Soviets realized the error and tried several three times to lead the armies intruders to withdraw from Berlin, so that the entire city could become an integral and undivided capital of the future socialist state, but were unable to get to the bottom, because of criminal arrogance of the Americans who were willing to unleash a new world war in order to keep this imperial outpost in the midst of a socialist country.

In 1948-49, as required during the late block of West Berlin by the Soviets (or block all access roads and rail), the three armies usurpers were compelled, sooner or later, to abandon the western part of city.

With typical imperialist arrogance, Americans, British and French decided instead to bypass the lock by organizing an airlift that clearly violates the airspace and heavily the Soviet zone: 1,398 flights a day well, a real airborne invasion!

The Soviets, unfortunately, did not understand the American people that their move was tantamount to a declaration of war and who would pay the consequences, or the slaughter of all the planes had flown over the airspace under Soviet control, but allowed passively airlift, suffering a crushing humiliation.

The USSR, the first state of workers and peasants, had joined the DNA in their love for peace and humanity and was more responsible compared to the capitalist countries, on the contrary, they see in war a huge source of profits, but this innate vocation of the land of the Soviets then turned into a large weakness (the same thing will happen during the Cuban missile crisis, when it was still Once the USSR to give up in front of the unlawful U.S. naval blockade in international waters).

"The Anti-Fascist Barrier"
At this point we chose an alternative solution that is building the wall around West Berlin, the "Anti-Fascist Barrier" ("Antifaschisticher Schutzwall"), as was rightly called, perhaps in hope that the three imperialist powers occupants to abandon West Berlin. At 1:11 on August 13, 1961 the East Berlin radio aborted the transmission "Melodien zur Nacht" for an extraordinary statement:

"The governments of the states of the Warsaw Pact are addressed to Parliament and the Government of DDR to the border with West Berlin enters into force a new system that can effectively prevent any subversive activities against the socialist bloc countries, while ensuring a reliable surveillance throughout the area surrounding the western part of town. "

It could not be otherwise, given that West Berlin was Nazi regurgitant recycled, soldiers, spies and Western officials, who would not have struggled to get out of town, located in the middle of the GDR (DDR in German) and carry out their criminal plans.

What Lies Beneath by western propaganda
Between 1961 and 1989 twenty-seven of the GDR border soldiers were killed by gunshot. In many cases, the border guards were killed by American soldiers and police in West Berlin, but also by civilians fleeing. A special memory worth

Peter Goring and Reinhold Huhn, both killed at the Berlin Wall in 1962. Peter Goring was struck mortal-mind by a bullet coming from the West 23 May 1962 near the cemetery Invalidenstraße during an exchange of gun shots between border guards and policemen in the GDR to West Berlin because of a drain in place.

border Reinhold Huhn The soldier lost his life June 18, 1962 near Checkpoint Charlie. Reinhold kept under control while other per-sons who were entering a tunnel to escape the West, one of the fugitives drew a weapon and stabbed him to death.

Reihnold Huhn and Peter Goring heroes were socialists. For them and other soldiers to the border killed, a memorial was erected in the district of Mitte where they were conduct of the recruits of border troops, the foreign delegations and school youth and children. The road passing by - the Schiitzenstraße - was renamed Reinhold Huhn-Straße.

The disappearance of history

All this can only make us aware of the disturbing evanescence and immateriality of our "knowledge" in the capitalist-democratic countries, because of the history, law, moral status, etc., are in fact a construction artifact that is only to the preservation of political and economic power of the bourgeoisie: distort, mystify, falsifying and manipulate the history and events is the only mission.

Obviously the history of the GDR is a far cry from the usual pap smear, criminalizing and shameful that we propinano historians hired by the world media and bourgeois power. In this chorus bleating out there, alas, some confused neo-communist, newly-Stalinists dell'antistalinismo, using the same categories and the same arguments as the most reactionary anti-communist.

Sure, there were contradictions mistakes, betrayals, but in essence it was a heroic and glorious experience, gained at the expense of the lives of many comrades. Proletarian vanguard who tried the example of the Soviet Union, to create a classless society without exploitation, without privileges or in which there was no place for falsehood of religion.

"The GDR is a socialist state of workers and peasants. It is the political organization of the working population of the city and the countryside under the guidance of the working class and its Marxist-Leninist. "
(the Constitution of the GDR, 1974)

Photo No. 3 is from Wikipedia: East Berlin, August 13, 1986, celebrations for the twenty-five years of the creation of the wall. Written on the panel: "25 Jahre antifaschisticher Schutzwall" (25 th anniversary of the Anti-Fascist Barrier)

UAACS - Union for the anti-religious atheism and Soviet Communism

Sweet 16 Invitation Maker Free

FAITH AND FOLLY

We have various terms to describe people who embrace many beliefs for which there is no rational justification. If their beliefs are extremely common, we call them "religious." Otherwise, those individuals are defined as "crazy," "psychotic" or "deluded". The majority of believers is perfectly healthy, of course, including those who commit atrocities in the name of their beliefs.

What is the difference between a man who believes that God will reward you with 72 virgins if he kills a score of Jewish teenagers and one believes that creatures from Alpha Centauri are sending messages to the world peace through the dryer? Actually there is a difference, but it does not give religion a flattering shade. The

Faith brings a certain kind of person to believe that no one else believes. Be guided by ideas for which you do not have concrete evidence (and, therefore, can not be justified in discussions with other human beings) generally indicates a way of thinking deeply unfair. This does not mean that all believers are mentally ill.

Yet, for some historical accident, is considered normal in our society believe that the Creator of the universe can hear our thoughts, and is a symptom of mental illness believe that is communicating with us in Morse code through the rain beating on the glass the bedroom. So even though in general people are not religious crazy, their beliefs are absolutely.

This is not surprising, since almost all religions have merely canonized a few of the fruits of ignorance and mental imbalance of the old and pass them on to us, as though they were primordial truths. As a result, billions of people still believe things that no sane person would believe on their own. In fact, it's hard to imagine a set of beliefs more than those fools that are the basis for many of our religious traditions.

Consider one of the cornerstones of the Catholic faith: "By the consecration the transubstantiation of bread and wine into the Body and Blood of Christ. Under the consecrated species of bread and wine, Christ himself, living and glorious, is present in a living, real and substantial, his Body and Blood with his soul and divinity.. " From the Catechism of the Catholic Church of Rome.

Jesus Christ, who, as is known, was born of a virgin, did it in defiance of death and ascended to heaven in the flesh, can now be eaten as a host. A few Latin words spoken on your favorite wine and you can also drink his blood. You can doubt that anyone asserted these beliefs on their own would take a fool? Or rather, there is some doubt over whether it is actually crazy?

The danger inherent in religious faith is that it allows otherwise normal human beings to reap the fruits of madness and consider them sacred. As each new generation of children is taught that religious propositions need not be justified as is the case for all other, civilization is still besieged by armies of irrational individuals. Even today we kill each other for the ancient literature. Who would have thought possible eventuality so tragically absurd?

Sam Harris - The End of Faith: Religion, Terror and the future of reason - New Media Worlds

(soon new content on the site http://www.ateismoantireligioso.com/ )

Backgrounds Para Proshow

Lenin and militant atheism

written by Lenin 12 March 1922 and published in No 3 of the magazine "Pod znameniem Marxism" ( Under the banner of Marxism) magazine of philosophy, politics and economics that was published in Russian and German.

A magazine wanting to be the body of the militant materialism must be a body fighting, first in that it must terminate and tirelessly pursue the current "lackeys graduates clerical obscurantism," whether they act as representatives Journal of science or as snipers who call themselves journalists' democratic left or socialist ideas .

Secondly, this journal should be the body of 'militant atheism . We departments or at least the official bodies whose task this work. But it is conducted with extreme softness, in a completely unsatisfactory and suffers the burden of the very conditions of our typical Russian bureaucracy (although Soviet).

E 'is therefore very important to complete the work of state bodies, to correct it and animate it, the magazine, which aims to become the organ of the militant materialism, leads propaganda and a tireless fight for atheism . You have to follow carefully all the published material in all languages, by translating, or at least review, all that has a certain value.

Engels has long urged the leaders of the modern proletariat to translate and widely disseminate among the people atheistic publications, battles of the late eighteenth century. To our shame, we have not yet done so (and this is one of many tests that are far easier to win power in a revolutionary period, that knowing how to serve it properly).

It does sometimes justify the weakness, failure to act, our inability by all sorts of considerations "higher order", saying for example that the old atheistic literature of the eighteenth century is outdated, unscientific, childish, and so on. There is nothing worse than similar pseudo-scientific sophistry, which mask or pedantry, or a complete misunderstanding of Marxism.

course in the works of atheistic revolutionaries of the eighteenth century one can find many things are not scientific and puerile. But nothing prevents the publishers of these works to reduce them and accompany them with brief annotations remember that the progress of scientific criticism of religions made by humanity since the end of the eighteenth century, indicating the most recent works on the subject, etc..

would be the biggest mistake, and the worst that would commit a Marxist to believe that the popular masses, made up of millions of human beings (and especially the mass of peasants and artisans) to pay the darkness, all 'ignorance and prejudices of modern society as a whole, can get out of this darkness just following the right path to a purely Marxist education.

E 'imperative to give these people the most varied material of atheistic propaganda, put them in contact with the facts relating to the most different domains of life, approach them in one way or another for them, then awakened from their sleep religious , shake them from all sides by the most different, and so on.

Publications lively, clever old atheists of the eighteenth century, who openly attacked, and so witty dominant clerical obscurantism, will prove more often than a thousand times more suitable to awaken people from sleep, religious, not paraphrases Marxism, boring, dry, almost entirely lacking in facts cleverly chosen, to show that prevail in our literature, and (needless to hide the sin), often distort Marxism.

All the works of Marx and Engels of some importance that we have been translated. The fear that, for us, the old the old materialism and atheism will be left without the corrections that you have made Marx and Engels, is therefore unfounded. The essential - and often forget the fact that our community, self-proclaimed Marxist, which actually distort Marxism - is able to affect the masses quite yet uncultivated a conscious attitude towards religious issues and a critical awareness of religions.

On the other hand, look at the representatives of the modern scientific criticism of religions. Almost always, these representatives of the bourgeoisie Read "complete" denial of their own religious prejudices on the reasoning with them immediately unmasked as ideological slaves of the bourgeoisie as a "lackey graduates clerical obscurantism."

two examples: the prof. R. Iu. Vipper has published a booklet in 1918: The Origins of Christianity (ed. Pharos, Moscow). Paraphrasing the main achievements of modern science, the author, not only does not fight prejudice and deceit are the weapons of the church as a political organization, not only remains silent on these issues, but the claim really ridiculous and ultrareazionaria to rise above the two "extremes": the idealistic and the materialistic. This means that serve the ruling bourgeoisie, all over the world, draws hundreds of millions of rubles on the profits squeezed from workers to support religion.

Arthur Drews The well-known German scientist who, in his book entitled The Myth of Christ, refutes the tales and religious prejudices and demonstrates that no Christian has ever existed, at the end of the book be delivered to the religion, but for a religion renewed, cleaned, refined, able to cope with "the natural stream that is growing day by day" (p. 238 of 4. German edition, 1910). He is a reactionary said, conscious that helps openly pimps to replace the old and rotten religious bias, prejudice brand new, even more repugnant and vile.

This does not mean that we should not translate Drews. This means that the communists and all the material as a consequence, even allies, to some extent, with the progressive part of the bourgeoisie, must tirelessly denounce it when it falls in the reaction. Avoid the alliance with the representatives of the bourgeoisie of the eighteenth century, namely the era in which the bourgeoisie was revolutionary, it would mean betraying Marxism and materialism, because "the alliance" with the Drews, in one form or another and within various constraints, it is essential to that we are fighting against the dominant religious obscurantism.

magazine under the banner of Marxism, which aims to be the body of the militant materialism, much should reserve space for atheistic propaganda, the exhibition of publications on the subject and to correct the enormous weaknesses of our state action in this field. Particularly important is the use of books and pamphlets that contain many facts and many comparisons demonstrating the relationship between interests and organizations of the bourgeoisie and the modern institutions of religious organizations and religious propaganda.

particularly important is all the material for the United States of America, where the official connection, state, between religion and the capital is less apparent. But there is more clearly that the so-called "modern democracy" (before which they prostrated themselves so inconsiderately the Mensheviks, the Socialist rivoluzionaci and, in part, anarchists ) is nothing but the freedom to preach what the bourgeoisie should you preach, and preach it agrees the most reactionary ideas, religion, obscurantism, the defense of the exploiters , etc..

Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov

(Lenin)

UAACS - Union for the anti-religious atheism and Soviet Communism